zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. BellLa+(OP)[view] [source] 2021-09-24 17:08:23
The article has been previously submitted with and has languished without interest, I think that the Intercept's headline alone is underplaying it a little and is not suited to this forum. I think if you read the article, the HN headline above is accurate. What specifically do you think is inaccurate? Even in tone?
replies(1): >>WarOnP+I2
2. WarOnP+I2[view] [source] 2021-09-24 17:21:35
>>BellLa+(OP)
That's a reasonable question. First - my understanding is that we're expected to repost headlines verbatim, even if they kind of suck. It's not some unbreakable rule but it's an objective we should commit to.

Past that, I offer that headlines that will lead the public we have toward thoughtful, measured, conclusions (that reflect where we actually are) - this would seem to be our best goal.

replies(1): >>BellLa+q3
◧◩
3. BellLa+q3[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-09-24 17:24:54
>>WarOnP+I2
Fair enough, it seems I can't edit it now, Dang obviously feel free to do so.
[go to top]