zlacker

[return to "Leaked grant proposal details high-risk coronavirus research"]
1. WarOnP+Va[view] [source] 2021-09-24 17:05:20
>>BellLa+(OP)
I agree with the comment from justapassenger. The title has been altered from the headline into inflammatory clickbait.
◧◩
2. BellLa+Cb[view] [source] 2021-09-24 17:08:23
>>WarOnP+Va
The article has been previously submitted with and has languished without interest, I think that the Intercept's headline alone is underplaying it a little and is not suited to this forum. I think if you read the article, the HN headline above is accurate. What specifically do you think is inaccurate? Even in tone?
◧◩◪
3. WarOnP+ke[view] [source] 2021-09-24 17:21:35
>>BellLa+Cb
That's a reasonable question. First - my understanding is that we're expected to repost headlines verbatim, even if they kind of suck. It's not some unbreakable rule but it's an objective we should commit to.

Past that, I offer that headlines that will lead the public we have toward thoughtful, measured, conclusions (that reflect where we actually are) - this would seem to be our best goal.

◧◩◪◨
4. BellLa+2f[view] [source] 2021-09-24 17:24:54
>>WarOnP+ke
Fair enough, it seems I can't edit it now, Dang obviously feel free to do so.
[go to top]