zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. ksaj+(OP)[view] [source] 2021-07-09 18:57:44
I wondered exactly this, because to this day I've only ever seen the red cross used for its intended meaning. It is absolutely recognizable for this purpose, and in those use cases. There were cases of misuse, but they were some time ago and already have been dealt with.

I used to have a toy ambulance that had the red cross logo on it. They probably should post a policy on what they consider to be acceptable play, and what is not. This would also impact a lot of movies and cartoons.

replies(1): >>pugwor+Mn
2. pugwor+Mn[view] [source] 2021-07-09 21:23:31
>>ksaj+(OP)
I think if used for intended meaning in a shooting game, any player wearing or showing the Red Cross would be a third team who's role is to heal everyone.

Which would actually be an interesting game idea...

[go to top]