zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. warlog+(OP)[view] [source] 2021-06-04 01:48:34
But it could be perceived as a conflict of interest, and that of itself is the reason to at least declare it (for transparency). This is how it works in ethics.
replies(2): >>wearyw+A >>tshadd+Aa
2. wearyw+A[view] [source] 2021-06-04 01:54:41
>>warlog+(OP)
Indeed, avoiding the perception of impropriety is second only to avoiding impropriety itself. When people perceive impropriety, even when there is none, trust in the system is undermined.
3. tshadd+Aa[view] [source] 2021-06-04 03:31:43
>>warlog+(OP)
Anything could be perceived as a conflict of interest. This entire subthread is an argument about whether it’s reasonable to consider this case a conflict of interest.
[go to top]