zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. tempor+(OP)[view] [source] 2021-03-29 06:48:48
I think the concept is pretty straightforward? It's if you believe women < men generally (not like, avg(women height) < avg(men height)).

The last one, "I liked a feature of her" is not misogynistic absent of context. The context here is really important. It's like saying "I like your haircut". Did I pass up promotion for another person in a non-modeling job because they had a shitty haircut?

replies(3): >>unisha+y2 >>techbi+A3 >>raducu+e6
2. unisha+y2[view] [source] 2021-03-29 07:18:34
>>tempor+(OP)
I think the problem was the "unintentional" part, which seems to be contradictory.
replies(1): >>raducu+T5
3. techbi+A3[view] [source] 2021-03-29 07:35:00
>>tempor+(OP)
Not sure I understand the analogy. You mean speaking professionally in a professional context is not (should not be?) misogynistic. Then is it not a little strange that you're commenting on a person's haircut, who is not applying for a modeling job for which they're required to cut their own hair?
replies(1): >>brigan+f41
◧◩
4. raducu+T5[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-03-29 08:04:28
>>unisha+y2
I clarrified it, basically someone made a remark/joke that is clearly sexist, but he never displayed sexism at all.

It was just unprofessional I would say.

For instance I can appreciate a dark joke that would clearly be sexist/racist/antisemitic/homophobic, I can even reproduce it in a like-minded circle of people, and I still don't consider myself sexist/racist/homophobic.

5. raducu+e6[view] [source] 2021-03-29 08:08:29
>>tempor+(OP)
You are right that context is everything, but it works both ways.

You can make a sexist joke without being sexist, but it can still be inapropriate/unprofessional, and it can still cost you dearly.

◧◩
6. brigan+f41[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-03-29 14:48:01
>>techbi+A3
You seem to be implying that it's not professional to mention a haircut. What is unprofessional about it?

I've had my haircut mentioned at work… because I'd had a haircut. It's people trying to be nice or make conversation, and neither of those things are unprofessional.

replies(1): >>techbi+Sl2
◧◩◪
7. techbi+Sl2[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-03-29 20:02:05
>>brigan+f41
Parent comment seemed to mention promotions based on appearance? Something else?

I understand your point, of course, but it does not actually explain theirs.

replies(1): >>brigan+Jc3
◧◩◪◨
8. brigan+Jc3[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-03-30 02:28:38
>>techbi+Sl2
Fair enough, I should've taken that into account.

I work from home so the only person who remarks on my hair is my wife, and her comments, if overheard, might pass for misandry. I'm trying to forment a Twitter mob against her in response.

[go to top]