zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. mytail+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-12-31 09:06:39
This is BS. They perfectly acknowledge that some imperial dynasties were not Han and have no problem with it. These 'foreign' dynasties adopted Han culture. Certainly, Chinese culture did not turn Mongol when the Emperor was an ethnic Mongol.

Please don't spread nonsense.

replies(1): >>rawgab+uA1
◧
2. rawgab+uA1[view] [source] 2020-12-31 21:00:12
>>mytail+(OP)
One scholar disagrees with you. "Reenvisioning the Qing: The Significance of the Qing Period in Chinese History" by Evelyn S. Rawski. https://www.history.ucsb.edu/wp-content/uploads/Evelyn-Rawsk...

  "'Sinicization' - the thesis that all of the non-Han peoples who have entered the Chinese realm have eventually been assimilated into the Chinese culture--is a twentieth-century Han nationalist interpretation of China's past."
replies(1): >>mytail+lS1
◧◩
3. mytail+lS1[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-12-31 22:56:13
>>rawgab+uA1
Considering that what you've quoted is making a different point, I am not sure that "one" scholar disagrees with me...
replies(1): >>rawgab+Qd2
◧◩◪
4. rawgab+Qd2[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-01-01 01:05:12
>>mytail+lS1
You said the foreign conquerors adopted Han culture.
[go to top]