zlacker

> feel comfortable saying that the biggest obstacle in progress for AI is UI

Yep.

>>ajfjrb+(OP)
Do you have a source for this? Not nitpicking, i actually need it for a project...

>>4k05+C
I believe he's referring to the absurdity of this statement, especially in relation to SpinningUp (it doesn't have any UI as it's a RL library, and the docs site are generated using standard Sphinx doc generator)

>>BiasRe+E5
OP might have just clicked through to the main OpenAI site and mixed the UI part in. The bulk of the comment is about documentation and presentation in general and viewing that in the context of the general great UX of OpenAI.

I know that GPT3 is impressive, but I'm not as convinced as some of the other commenters here that it's a generated comment. If a similar comment were posted on a non-AI related post, nobody would bat an eye.

Is there an equivalent to Hanlon's razor for AI? "Don't attribute to an text generation AI, which could be adquately explained by slightly nonsensical speech".

>>hobofa+Xr
That's exactly right, I should've been more astute to point out that it was Sphinx in my comment and dwell more on the general demeanor of the documentation with more examples.