zlacker

>>samroh+(OP)
"Pray, who is the candidate's tailor?" -Hilbert

Who is responsible for OpenAI's UI/UX design? It is immaculate and should be the standard for the community. I'm always dazzled by the impeccable standards of OpenAI with regards to tone, presentation, accessibility.

The documentation is both familiar but distinct, an impressive achievement!

I have my own personal qualms on OpenAI's ethics and virtues but am nevertheless impressed by their aesthetics and regard for their publicity. It's always delightful to look at their work.

OpenAI has in my opinion, the most appropriate presentation for their ideas with marketing and branding. It feels exquisitely simple to grasp what goes on here.

I feel comfortable saying that the biggest obstacle in progress for AI is UI but projects such as this give me hope.

>>_5659+B3
I assume this comment is generated? The link is a standard Sphinx doc.

>>colord+v4
> feel comfortable saying that the biggest obstacle in progress for AI is UI

Yep.

>>ajfjrb+S6
Do you have a source for this? Not nitpicking, i actually need it for a project...

>>4k05+u7
I believe he's referring to the absurdity of this statement, especially in relation to SpinningUp (it doesn't have any UI as it's a RL library, and the docs site are generated using standard Sphinx doc generator)

>>BiasRe+wc
OP might have just clicked through to the main OpenAI site and mixed the UI part in. The bulk of the comment is about documentation and presentation in general and viewing that in the context of the general great UX of OpenAI.

I know that GPT3 is impressive, but I'm not as convinced as some of the other commenters here that it's a generated comment. If a similar comment were posted on a non-AI related post, nobody would bat an eye.

Is there an equivalent to Hanlon's razor for AI? "Don't attribute to an text generation AI, which could be adquately explained by slightly nonsensical speech".