zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. daniel+(OP)[view] [source] 2011-04-03 23:18:31
This is true, but it doesn't necessarily mean that I'm incorrect in my assessment. Compare the average Metafilter comment to the average YouTube comment. You'd have a difficult time making the case that there wasn't a discernible difference in quality between the two.
replies(1): >>jacque+T
2. jacque+T[view] [source] 2011-04-03 23:36:21
>>daniel+(OP)
> This is true, but it doesn't necessarily mean that I'm incorrect in my assessment.

Right, but as the subject of a membership ritual I have to discount your assertion.

Sometimes membership rituals do increase value. But they increase perceived value regardless of what follows.

replies(1): >>daniel+f1
◧◩
3. daniel+f1[view] [source] [discussion] 2011-04-03 23:46:22
>>jacque+T
Aren't you engaging in the genetic fallacy here though? Pointing out a possible origin of my belief does not mean that you have disproved the belief.
replies(1): >>jacque+U1
◧◩◪
4. jacque+U1[view] [source] [discussion] 2011-04-04 00:01:38
>>daniel+f1
As developed through this discussion, my point would be that we need an outsider's perspective on the quality of a community. Perhaps a "passer by".
[go to top]