zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. dijit+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-07-23 12:34:54
They are, but it's always a trade-off.

Stock paste goes for longevity and cooling, so it's kinda crummy at both.

Thermal pads go for longevity with a sacrifice to cooling.

High performance paste like arctic silver goes for cooling over longevity; but can be re-applied many times as it doesn't damage hardware.

Liquid metal like Thermal Grizzly's: conductonaught, goes for extreme cooling at the expense of hardware. (IE; it will literally eat your computer, slowly, over time).

replies(1): >>bboygr+Et
2. bboygr+Et[view] [source] 2020-07-23 15:38:55
>>dijit+(OP)
> They are, but it's always a trade-off.

According to a Linus techtips video on Youtube the difference is not really measurable. So I kind of tend to think that a high quality thermal pad is just simply superior in every way. The only reason I didn't try it, is because I couldn't find any in stock.

replies(1): >>dijit+2v
◧◩
3. dijit+2v[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-07-23 15:45:29
>>bboygr+Et
LTT noted differences, but yes, they're not large:

https://youtu.be/YpphKzmDiJM?t=420

FWIW Steve Burke did an even more detailed burn down of these pads:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=niAQs8dZohE

(LTT was later able to get -20C cooling with Liquid Metal: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hdTsra-uLBI )

[go to top]