zlacker

[parent] [thread] 11 comments
1. oh_sig+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-06-22 19:53:44
The 'proactive' is just driving or walking around a neighborhood. It isn't (necessarily) doing things like stop and frisk or just going around accosting random people on the street.
replies(1): >>sudosy+H1
2. sudosy+H1[view] [source] 2020-06-22 19:59:44
>>oh_sig+(OP)
It's not just driving or walking around a neighbourhood, it's doing your best to find the maximum amount of crime. Otherwise, you wouldn't need mathematical models in order to optimize the "efficacity" of the operation.

The vast majority of crime where police should be involved are crimes where the victim can call the police later. For those that don't fit this criteria, either police patrols are already ineffective (targeted assassinations, for example), or the police isn't being called because the victim thinks it will make the situation worse. Which in many cases is true, and I think fixing that problem would be a good step to take.

replies(2): >>oh_sig+U2 >>austin+O3
◧◩
3. oh_sig+U2[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-22 20:03:43
>>sudosy+H1
I guess I don't really understand what is generally wrong with a police officer looking for a crime being committed in public and then stopping it?
replies(1): >>kingka+5o
◧◩
4. austin+O3[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-22 20:06:55
>>sudosy+H1
In the town where I grew up the most common non-traffic emergency calls were calls of injury of which the most serious were cardiac distress. The police used mathematical models to position two SUV patrols at opposite sides of town where each contained some manner electric cardio medical device for rapid response to heart attacks.
replies(1): >>sudosy+d5
◧◩◪
5. sudosy+d5[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-22 20:12:41
>>austin+O3
Sure, this is also done in my city. Except that isn't the responsibility of police, but that of the EMS service/paramedics/firefighters. If the police are doing that in your town I also think that's problematic, because many people won't call if they know the police are going to come for injuries.
replies(1): >>austin+O8
◧◩◪◨
6. austin+O8[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-22 20:26:01
>>sudosy+d5
> because many people won't call if they know the police are going to come for injuries.

That is not what occurred in practice and there is no data to suggest this would ever be a probable outcome. At any rate people don’t have a choice on who responds if the call is to 911.

replies(2): >>heavys+3f >>sudosy+WU
◧◩◪◨⬒
7. heavys+3f[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-22 20:49:57
>>austin+O8
> there is no data to suggest this would ever be a probable outcome

The data behind 911 Good Samaritan laws[1] that protect people from being arrested when they call in overdoses would like to have a word with you.

[1] https://www.shatterproof.org/advocacy/state-by-state-informa...

◧◩◪
8. kingka+5o[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-22 21:32:24
>>oh_sig+U2
We create what we look for
replies(1): >>DenisM+Lv
◧◩◪◨
9. DenisM+Lv[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-22 22:11:19
>>kingka+5o
Are doctors creating cancer and high cholesterol?
replies(1): >>sudosy+1V
◧◩◪◨⬒
10. sudosy+WU[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-23 01:26:32
>>austin+O8
In my city if there is a 911 call for a medical emergency you will get the firefighters or the ambulance faster, and depending on the emergency might not get police at all.

In any case, if you are giving anyone defibrillators and locating them to minimize response time to cardiac incidents, it would be absurd to give it to the police.

◧◩◪◨⬒
11. sudosy+1V[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-23 01:28:05
>>DenisM+Lv
Doctors actually fix cancer and high cholesterol, police simply takes the criminals away but does not fix crime. It's an approach to crime about as sophisticated and effective as blood-letting and amputations - works sometimes, makes everything worse when that's all you use.
replies(1): >>DenisM+gY
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
12. DenisM+gY[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-23 02:06:34
>>sudosy+1V
How do you know that removing criminals away does not reduce crime?
[go to top]