zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. tartor+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-06-15 14:52:41
Are we talking war combat here? Because in a civilian case shooting legs and taking cover might just as well do it.

The real reason they shoot to kill is because they don’t want the victim to sue. A dead man never sued, their families have a lower chance of getting anything though that has started to change with so much footage.

replies(1): >>nan0+3h
2. nan0+3h[view] [source] 2020-06-15 16:11:42
>>tartor+(OP)
"shooting legs"

No, you can't just shoot someone in the leg to disable them. You have very high chances of hitting main arteries anywhere (arms and legs).

Shooting a human being is not like it is in Hollywood movies. Once an officer pulls out his/her firearm and use it they know it means killing the person. That's why they go through other means of less lethal force before drawing.

Edit: Spelling

[go to top]