zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. pjc50+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-06-15 11:58:48
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statue_of_Edward_Colston

The statue of a slaver and mass murderer had been controversial for the past 30 years. I wonder if things would have gone differently if the "recontextualisation" plaque had been allowed.

There has, predictably, been a backlash. Resulting in this fiasco where a guy came from Essex to defend some statues he didn't understand ended up urinating on a monument he didn't notice. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-53040301

replies(2): >>UncleM+Bl >>Chris2+5C
2. UncleM+Bl[view] [source] 2020-06-15 14:33:48
>>pjc50+(OP)
Symbols are more powerful than words. Statues have always existed to project values. A plaque adding context won’t actually achieve the goal.
3. Chris2+5C[view] [source] 2020-06-15 15:54:29
>>pjc50+(OP)
> a guy came from Essex to defend some statues he didn't understand ended up urinating on a monument he didn't notice

That article doesn't say much about the guy who urinate, how do you know what he knew/understood, or where he came from?

replies(1): >>pjc50+vI
◧◩
4. pjc50+vI[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-15 16:26:18
>>Chris2+5C
via https://twitter.com/CourtNewsUK/status/1272478151143313408
[go to top]