zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. ashton+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-06-15 11:41:59
I think that their continued behavior is putting the pensions at risk, since those depend on continuous taxpayer contributions.

It’s not wise to tear gas the people who are going to pay for your retirement.

replies(1): >>pc86+Pw
2. pc86+Pw[view] [source] 2020-06-15 15:27:11
>>ashton+(OP)
Based on this comment it's not clear how much experience you have with public sector unions generally or LEO contract negotiations specifically, or how public sector pensions typically work. Barring conviction of a crime (and sometimes even in spite of conviction, depending on the offense), your pension is generally set based on your hire date, and is a percentage of your salary based on the average over some period of time (last 3 years is pretty common). About half the time these pensions are exempt from municipal bankruptcies. It would take legislation to dismantle these pension systems that would almost certainly be litigated and spend years in court, during which time they would still have to be paid out.

They're not putting their financial future at risk.

replies(1): >>ashton+Nx
◧◩
3. ashton+Nx[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-15 15:30:35
>>pc86+Pw
The individual officer is guaranteed access to the pension, but there is no guarantee that the public ever bothered to fully fund said pension.
[go to top]