zlacker

[parent] [thread] 11 comments
1. jiscar+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-06-12 14:50:48
I've heard this explained by a comparison. If you have a block with four burger joints and one taco joint, you'd expect the taco joint to be the most popular.

Not saying this is correct, but I thought it was an interesting analogy.

replies(1): >>preinh+f5
2. preinh+f5[view] [source] 2020-06-12 15:18:01
>>jiscar+(OP)
So one might expect the taco joint to be the most popular.

But explicitly the parent is saying that the taco joint is more popular than all of the burger joints _combined_. Which is not what I would have guessed.

replies(2): >>seanmc+J6 >>Izkata+T7
◧◩
3. seanmc+J6[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-12 15:26:53
>>preinh+f5
If we are talking cable, I believe it. I haven’t had cable for the last couple of decades, I would venture that not many liberals, who tend to be younger, have cable. If you were going to start a cable channel now, who would you pander to: the audience that doesn’t have that much cable (liberals) or the audience that does (conservatives).
replies(1): >>jiscar+BC
◧◩
4. Izkata+T7[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-12 15:34:01
>>preinh+f5
Would you have guessed it if there were equal numbers of burger-lovers and taco-lovers?

'Cause despite what it looks like online, the US is about equally split between liberal and conservative.

replies(1): >>cma+cy
◧◩◪
5. cma+cy[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-12 18:02:46
>>Izkata+T7
If CNN was as partisan as MSNBC, maybe.
replies(2): >>AuryGl+HB >>Izkata+AU
◧◩◪◨
6. AuryGl+HB[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-12 18:22:29
>>cma+cy
They’re pretty close, especially in regard to Trump himself. For whatever reason his existence turned up partisanship to 11, on both sides.
◧◩◪
7. jiscar+BC[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-12 18:27:50
>>seanmc+J6
Median age (2017)[1]: CNN 60 Fox News 65 MSNBC 65

From my peer group (around forty), rather than liberal vs. conservative breakdown, I'd say those who reluctantly subscribe to cable are sports fans.

[1]https://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/heres-the-median-age-of-the-...

replies(1): >>seanmc+8Q
◧◩◪◨
8. seanmc+8Q[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-12 19:47:11
>>jiscar+BC
That is only measuring people who still have cable. It doesn’t tell you anything about those that don’t watch cable news at all. All we can tell is that the 60+ group prefers Fox.

I did say liberals tend to watch less cable because they tend to be younger, it doesn’t mean that liberals in general have a propensity for cutting the cord.

◧◩◪◨
9. Izkata+AU[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-12 20:07:21
>>cma+cy
...it was nicknamed the Clinton News Network in 2016 because of how partisan it gets.
replies(1): >>cma+lX
◧◩◪◨⬒
10. cma+lX[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-12 20:20:40
>>Izkata+AU
By Limbaugh?
replies(1): >>andrew+Ta5
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
11. andrew+Ta5[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-14 17:48:33
>>cma+lX
By anyone. Any "news" network that's on TV is rubbish. It's not like there's a certification or anything.

Anyone who mocks Fox news and then turns around and watches cnn, msnbc, etc, is a fool.

replies(1): >>cma+ufi
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
12. cma+ufi[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-19 01:00:00
>>andrew+Ta5
Rush Limbaugh coined that term in 1993 in his book (or perhaps earlier), it wasn't a 2016 invention.
[go to top]