zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
5 comments
1. cma+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2020-06-12 18:02:46
If CNN was as partisan as MSNBC, maybe.
replies(2):
>>AuryGl+v3
>>Izkata+om
◧
2. AuryGl+v3
[view]
[source]
2020-06-12 18:22:29
>>cma+(OP)
They’re pretty close, especially in regard to Trump himself. For whatever reason his existence turned up partisanship to 11, on both sides.
◧
3. Izkata+om
[view]
[source]
2020-06-12 20:07:21
>>cma+(OP)
...it was nicknamed the Clinton News Network in 2016 because of how partisan it gets.
replies(1):
>>cma+9p
◧◩
4. cma+9p
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2020-06-12 20:20:40
>>Izkata+om
By Limbaugh?
replies(1):
>>andrew+HC4
◧◩◪
5. andrew+HC4
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2020-06-14 17:48:33
>>cma+9p
By anyone. Any "news" network that's on TV is rubbish. It's not like there's a certification or anything.
Anyone who mocks Fox news and then turns around and watches cnn, msnbc, etc, is a fool.
replies(1):
>>cma+iHh
◧◩◪◨
6. cma+iHh
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2020-06-19 01:00:00
>>andrew+HC4
Rush Limbaugh coined that term in 1993 in his book (or perhaps earlier), it wasn't a 2016 invention.
[go to top]