zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. nostro+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-06-02 02:11:16
"Police commanders ... WANT mayhem"

That's what I responded to. I'm curious if you truly think the people that I listed want to see their home towns on fire.

replies(4): >>HarryH+h >>somebr+C >>aaronb+K >>throw_+91
2. HarryH+h[view] [source] 2020-06-02 02:13:30
>>nostro+(OP)
If it increases their power and budget - sure! It's not as if they were personally affected.
3. somebr+C[view] [source] 2020-06-02 02:16:30
>>nostro+(OP)
> I'm curious if you truly think the people that I listed want to see their home towns on fire

When given a choice to protect murderous cops or prevent a fire, they chose to protect the murderous cops. All the cops have to do is go to jail, get a court date, post bail and sit at home. Why can't a cop that murdered someone be that inconvenienced?

4. aaronb+K[view] [source] 2020-06-02 02:17:38
>>nostro+(OP)
Most Police Don’t Live In The Cities They Serve: https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/most-police-dont-live-i...

Chicago: 88% of police live in city

St Louis: 59%

Atlanta: 14%

Minneapolis: 10% (white officers: 5%)

Seattle: 12%

Oakland: 9%

Also, certainly in Minneapolis—and likely elsewhere—the police chief doesn't seem to have nearly as much control over rank and file officers as the union head does. This story gives more texture: https://www.motherjones.com/crime-justice/2020/05/minneapoli...

replies(3): >>calvin+B4 >>ineeda+D5 >>dionid+Ua
5. throw_+91[view] [source] 2020-06-02 02:22:15
>>nostro+(OP)
What that ellipsis elides completely changes the meaning of the quote. The pro-police forces referred to don't necessarily include the commander. If the original person was talking about the police, would they not have used the term "police forces" instead? The fans aren't the team.
◧◩
6. calvin+B4[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-02 02:52:43
>>aaronb+K
Philadelphia takes a split approach. See below:

The city has mandated residency requirements for nearly all city employees since the 1950s, but police and some other public workers are exempt, The Philadelphia Tribune reports. Approximately 30 percent of Philadelphia police officers live outside of Philadelphia, according to Acting Commissioner Christine Coulter.

In 2010, the police union won the right for officers who have five or more years of experience to live outside the city limits. Those terms have been in effect since 2012. Firefighters and sheriff’s deputies with five or more years of service were allowed to live outside of the city in 2016.

◧◩
7. ineeda+D5[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-02 02:59:55
>>aaronb+K
And apparently the union head has a history of complaints against him, one for wearing a "white power" patch: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.insider.com/president-minne...
◧◩
8. dionid+Ua[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-02 03:50:33
>>aaronb+K
I'm a broken record on this, but this is yet another example demonstrating that it's basically impossible to compare cities along political borders. "Chicago" covers 234 sq/mi at the center of Chicago, whereas "Minneapolis" covers about 54 sq/mi of the center of Minneapolis, so an officer in Minneapolis and one in Chicago could be living and working in nearly identical environments -- they may, for example, both be living in an old, majority white inner-ring suburb a couple miles from Downtown and policing a majority black area they have no history in -- and the Chicago officer would be counted as living in Chicago, but the Minneapolis officer would not be counted as living in Minneapolis.

Their day-to-day experiences, their relationship to the communities they serve, their physical distance from Downtown, the built environment of their own neighborhoods, the socio-economic make-up of their friends and family -- and on and on and on -- could be practically identical, but we'd count them differently in your list.

[go to top]