zlacker

I agree that that is a very valid concern. I’d hope the data is anonymized (even though I recognize anonymized data is not perfect).

>>jwilbe+(OP)
You are also opening yourself up to severe defamation lawsuits by publishing any information that is incorrect.

>>chrisc+X3
How would that claim work unless one is shown to have altered a public record provided by a court? I’d think such a claim would be dismissed upon as much as one review of discovery if it’s shown that you lawfully obtained the records and otherwise didn’t tamper with said records.

Edit: or am I thinking of libel?