zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. billme+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-05-29 19:22:48
False; Katrina & US border patrol was what officially sparked the call to (publicly) use drones in the US.

CBP has used drones with FAA approval within the US since 2006; which does not included any use prior to 2006 which remains classified.

SOURCE: https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB115491642950528436

replies(1): >>A4ET8a+ao
2. A4ET8a+ao[view] [source] 2020-05-29 21:41:27
>>billme+(OP)
Odd question. The thing that I find odd about it is the jurisdiction of US border patrol here. Why would the government call them as opposed to, say, national guard? I am curious.
replies(3): >>Peteri+Dq >>billme+Vr >>joncra+Su
◧◩
3. Peteri+Dq[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-05-29 22:00:52
>>A4ET8a+ao
Probably because US border patrol has aerial surveillance vehicles and lots of experience in their use, and the national guard likely does not
replies(1): >>billme+7s
◧◩
4. billme+Vr[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-05-29 22:08:25
>>A4ET8a+ao
Here’s a map of their jurisdiction:

https://www.citylab.com/equity/2018/05/who-lives-in-border-p...

◧◩◪
5. billme+7s[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-05-29 22:09:44
>>Peteri+Dq
They both have experience, US National Guard would require DoD approval to fly domestic missions.
◧◩
6. joncra+Su[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-05-29 22:28:18
>>A4ET8a+ao
Because there's a suspension of civil liberties within X miles of a border, and the power can be exercised by the USBP.

(Edit: see map posted in a sibling comment. See position of Minneapolis on said map)

[go to top]