zlacker

[parent] [thread] 0 comments
1. dpflan+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-05-29 18:39:20
Oh, interesting, here is the court case:

> https://www.nacdl.org/getattachment/136371f4-aa38-476f-bd9a-...

On page 12:

"There was no improper use of an unmanned aerial vehicle. It appears to have had no bearing on these charges being contested here."

[go to top]