zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. Ashley+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-05-29 13:22:15
Well of course it isn't "more thuggish." The use of "thug" was done on purpose. It is a known racist dog whistle. Trump's racist followers know exactly what he means when he says "These THUGS are..." They replace that with the n word. It's just as a society we don't allow them to say the n word any more, so they've replaced it with a myriad of dog whistles.

What I'm saying is that, in their minds, every single person in that mob is a "thug," and everything they're doing is (in your words) "thuggish."

But the mob of white folks in Charlottesville? Nothing thuggish there. That's just white folks protesting against being oppressed by minorities.

replies(2): >>SpicyL+W >>jonhoh+g6
2. SpicyL+W[view] [source] 2020-05-29 13:27:04
>>Ashley+(OP)
I would call any group of people who burns down a police station, or breaks into a Target and starts stealing stuff, thuggish. The mob of white folks in Charlottesville did not, as far as I know, do these things.
replies(1): >>Ashley+pa
3. jonhoh+g6[view] [source] 2020-05-29 14:01:21
>>Ashley+(OP)
The previous president used “thug” to describe Baltimore rioters. Would you consider that racially charged?

https://historymusings.wordpress.com/2015/04/28/full-text-ob...

I didn’t vote for Trump, but it’s clear he’s referring to individuals and groups that are destroying areas of Minneapolis.

replies(1): >>Ashley+ea
◧◩
4. Ashley+ea[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-05-29 14:25:53
>>jonhoh+g6
Yes. Yes I would. I wouldn't be surprised if that speech was written by a white person who doesn't understand the meaning behind it. I guarantee Obama fully understands how that term is an epithet.

https://www.google.com/search?q=history+of+thug+as+a+race+wh...

replies(1): >>jonhoh+8N1
◧◩
5. Ashley+pa[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-05-29 14:26:52
>>SpicyL+W
Yeah, they only murdered a black person. That's not nearly as bad as burning a building.

/s for those who can't see that I'm responding to someone who has been trolling this thread hard

replies(1): >>darker+kE2
◧◩◪
6. jonhoh+8N1[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-05-29 22:53:41
>>Ashley+ea
So then he would have recanted when called out and the Whitehouse wouldn't have stood by the language - https://www.usatoday.com/story/theoval/2015/04/29/obama-whit.... Either he thought the word was appropriate or wasn't able to control his staff writers and spokespeople.
replies(1): >>darker+BE2
◧◩◪
7. darker+kE2[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-05-30 09:41:37
>>Ashley+pa
I think this person is actually not a troll, just has some ideas that are maybe not fully thought through. I see evidence of an open mind by the poster elsewhere on the thread. Let's try to have patience with other people.
◧◩◪◨
8. darker+BE2[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-05-30 09:46:01
>>jonhoh+8N1
I'd say he likely used it as an appeal to people who view things like this through a racial lens. He was trying to draw a line between most black people and those who would physically attack police officers.

You bring up an interesting point with Obama's usage of the word, and I would agree that he knew what he was doing when he used it. As does Trump.

[go to top]