zlacker

Can someone please break down that first sentence into multiple chunks. I genuinely have a hard time parsing it

>>vander+(OP)
The commenter above you believes that inclusivity standards will lead to a situation whereby one party could claim that certain genuinely controversial statements are actually beyond reasonable dispute, and that any such dispute could therefore only come about as a consequence of the disagreeing party not accepting the first party and/or their identity.

That was surprisingly difficult. Frankly, it's a little strange to see such an illucid response being seemingly well received by HN.

>>DC-3+D6
Perhaps your difficulties with comprehension regarding the comment are more orthogonal than you might have led yourself to believe?

>>textge+58
Ironically, I don't know what you're saying here.

> Perhaps your difficulties with comprehension regarding the comment are more orthogonal

'My difficulties with comprehension' constitute one metric. Orthogonality, in any way that I understand it, is a property of multiple such metrics.