zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. andrew+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-04-02 15:31:58
How does the process described help prevent the issue of an infected person placing grocery items in the cart while shopping, only to have the cashier touch them at a later point in time?
replies(3): >>ssully+n >>dangus+N >>umanwi+Mf
2. ssully+n[view] [source] 2020-04-02 15:34:14
>>andrew+(OP)
It doesn't, but it helps keep people separated. I did notice each cashier had their own bottle of hand sanitizer, so that could help if they used it after each transaction. Personally, I would still want gloves and a surgical mask if I were them.
replies(1): >>andrew+w1
3. dangus+N[view] [source] 2020-04-02 15:36:33
>>andrew+(OP)
I'm not an expert, but, if in the described scenario the cashier doesn't touch their face and they frequently wash hands/change gloves, I don't think this method of transmission is as effective as close proximity transmission via the humid air coming in and out of your nose and mouth.
◧◩
4. andrew+w1[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-04-02 15:40:54
>>ssully+n
Ahh gotcha, I see now. I definitely think something is better than nothing in this context and would help slow and/or reduce transmission in general! Just wasn't sure if I had missed something or what have you.
5. umanwi+Mf[view] [source] 2020-04-02 17:02:22
>>andrew+(OP)
Comments like this are maddening.

No mitigation effort is perfect. Not even vaccines work perfectly.

The point is to reduce the average number of people that each infected person spreads the disease to. Not to get it to 0, which is impossible.

[go to top]