zlacker

[parent] [thread] 0 comments
1. throwa+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-01-27 01:25:54
> His distortion seems exactly like every pop-sci article today

The distinction is that pop-sci articles are just journalism. Most academics take pop-sci journalism in their field with a grain of salt at most, and usually a hard eye-roll.

Real scientific journal/conference articles are held to real standards. Exaggerating or misreporting results in a scientific article is basically malpractice. It's by far the worst (scientific) thing that a scientist can do.

[go to top]