zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. rl3+(OP)[view] [source] 2019-12-07 01:32:53
I suspect in about 20-30 years that method will be considered antiquated, and brain implants with direct access to the user's visual cortex will be far more sensible for that kind of thing.
replies(1): >>6gvONx+P5
2. 6gvONx+P5[view] [source] 2019-12-07 03:06:00
>>rl3+(OP)
AR brain implants in 20-30 years? We can't even cure hemorrhoids. No way that timeline is accurate.
replies(1): >>rl3+Y9
◧◩
3. rl3+Y9[view] [source] [discussion] 2019-12-07 04:23:57
>>6gvONx+P5
Not saying it'll be commonplace by then, just that the technology will probably exist.

As I understand it today, Neuralink already has a surgical robot that can thread electrodes in between individual neurons with minimal damage.

replies(1): >>6gvONx+Tf
◧◩◪
4. 6gvONx+Tf[view] [source] [discussion] 2019-12-07 06:23:34
>>rl3+Y9
Neuroprosthetics as a field has a fairly long history. It's fascinating. However, it moves slowly, like most everything else human body related.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroprosthetics#History

[go to top]