zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. spzb+(OP)[view] [source] 2019-10-04 10:12:24
In this particular case, you're right. But as a general principle DNS is not necessarily owned by the same organisation as hosts the website.
replies(1): >>oarsin+t2
2. oarsin+t2[view] [source] 2019-10-04 10:44:36
>>spzb+(OP)
Correct. It's also worth noting that as a general principle, the DNS server making the request on behalf of the user is hosted in the same network as the user, and not an external third party.

In this particular case, it's one CDN taking issue with another CDN only. No other DNS providers appear to be impacted.

[go to top]