zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. KirinD+(OP)[view] [source] 2019-07-16 14:46:25
They organized the woman's walkout, so it seems relevant to mention that they were women facing retaliation for protesting the treatment of women.
replies(1): >>user17+e2
2. user17+e2[view] [source] 2019-07-16 14:59:12
>>KirinD+(OP)
Imho it isn't relevant. The implication of OP is that the fact that they are female paints Google in a bad light, not that they were protest leaders.

Corporations do not care about gender, it's all about power and control, and they do not care about the gender of those who they have to dismantle to keep it.

The Canadian Documentary "The Corporation" is a good example of how corporations behave: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y888wVY5hzw

Dividing Media narratives help to keep people from realizing who's their common enemy.

replies(2): >>fzeror+w4 >>KirinD+F4
◧◩
3. fzeror+w4[view] [source] [discussion] 2019-07-16 15:14:02
>>user17+e2
Why is talking about how women are treated differently in the workplace somehow dividing narratives?

And saying corporations do not care about gender is just wrong. Because corporations protect people who harass women. I'm rather baffled by all of the outrage going on because the article mentioned the person was a woman.

◧◩
4. KirinD+F4[view] [source] [discussion] 2019-07-16 15:14:26
>>user17+e2
If a set of powerful men use the interests to said corporation to enrich themselves at the expense of women who are there, then it is definitely a sexism issue.

I appreciate the economic arguments you are hinting at, but they are not incompatible with the notion that sexism was at play. We know, factually, that executives Google broke the law and then we're paid large sums of money to leave.

You cannot easily disentangle these power dynamics. Nor should you, because corporations are just large groups of people with special legal permissions from the government. The idea that interpersonal conflict would go away and such an environment seems to contradict the facts and hand.

replies(2): >>anonus+f5 >>user17+RX1
◧◩◪
5. anonus+f5[view] [source] [discussion] 2019-07-16 15:17:29
>>KirinD+F4
Evidence over supposition.

I have no problem with the claim in the face of evidence. I just don't see any here.

replies(1): >>KirinD+A5
◧◩◪◨
6. KirinD+A5[view] [source] [discussion] 2019-07-16 15:19:46
>>anonus+f5
What precisely are you asking evidence for? I can't work it out.

are you asking for evidence that there was high profile examples of sexism at Google? That essentially went unpunished? That's all the matter public record.

Are you asking for evidence that the people who have been forced out helped organize the women's march?

◧◩◪
7. user17+RX1[view] [source] [discussion] 2019-07-17 10:45:15
>>KirinD+F4
There is "sexism" on both sides. Powerful women use it against powerless men, and vice versa.

Ignoring one aspect over the other won't lead to lasting solutions. Since more men are leaders than women (men are naturally inclined to be leaders), the percentage of men enriching themselves at the expense of women is accordingly.

Google Protest has also been going on for many things that aren't related to gender, for example AI and their China project.

[go to top]