zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. newsca+(OP)[view] [source] 2019-07-02 17:12:09
IANAL but that could be interpreted as lying to a federal officer, given your participation in Hacker News discussions
replies(2): >>tatami+81 >>EForEn+R1
2. tatami+81[view] [source] 2019-07-02 17:19:07
>>newsca+(OP)
But when internet forums count as social media, few can provide a complete list of websites they have engaged with.

I definitely can't recall every one of those I had been on in the last decades.

replies(1): >>EForEn+a2
3. EForEn+R1[view] [source] 2019-07-02 17:24:05
>>newsca+(OP)
I wonder if one could truthfully state "no, I'm not on any social media [at this exact moment, since I'm talking to you and not actively using any social media]" and avoid any potential legal trouble, or if there's some clause or mechanism in whatever law applies here that's designed specifically to address intentionally misleading word choices.
◧◩
4. EForEn+a2[view] [source] [discussion] 2019-07-02 17:25:53
>>tatami+81
The law will have to define explicitly what it means to have an active social media account.
[go to top]