zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. girvo+(OP)[view] [source] 2018-09-12 08:10:58
Thus putting him even further behind in the rat-race, where those who weren’t forced into debt due to their poor choice of birth parents (sarcasm, obviously) and circumstance.
replies(1): >>ericd+P2
2. ericd+P2[view] [source] 2018-09-12 08:45:50
>>girvo+(OP)
Do you think the system should be structured so that no one is ever behind anyone else in the "rat race"?
replies(1): >>michae+cl
◧◩
3. michae+cl[view] [source] [discussion] 2018-09-12 12:18:59
>>ericd+P2
From the starting point? Absolutely. That's essentially equality of opportunity in a nutshell. What you do with what you've got from a relatively equal starting point is up to you.
replies(2): >>darawk+2O1 >>ericd+rY2
◧◩◪
4. darawk+2O1[view] [source] [discussion] 2018-09-12 21:11:20
>>michae+cl
Some people have higher IQs than other people. Should we equalize that, too?
◧◩◪
5. ericd+rY2[view] [source] [discussion] 2018-09-13 11:54:31
>>michae+cl
So you'd advocate for eliminating inheritance, free association between people, the choice of where to live, etc? And if you wanted to get more extreme, as a sibling mentions, eliminate heritable differences?

Or do you just mean things like free education for all?

[go to top]