zlacker

Same thing works the other way around but I don't know if it has a name. I frequently see things like yoghurt/juice or shampoo/antiperspirant/shaving accessories to be priced higher if they are branded "for men". You can literally buy the same thing in pink colour and it's cheaper.

The only case where I agree is that stupidly, UK government applies extra tax to sanitary items for women, while cosmetics for men do not have such tax. That is stupid, but that's a literal tax chosen by the government.

>>gambit+(OP)
Mind to give a link for that UK extra tax? I wonder how it's worded :)

>>mantas+Oa
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tampon_tax

It's just normal VAT, the issue is that many "necessary" products don't have VAT on them, but tampons or pads do, even though they are a biological necessity.

>>gambit+qd
Toilet paper is often taxed too, but of course it doesn't fit the narrative.

>>xeeeee+5j
You can use a bidet instead and never buy any toilet paper. If you are a woman you need to buy some sanitary products at least once a month.

>>gambit+Ml
Even when you're using a bidet, you still need toilet paper.

Also, if we're talking about less common alternatives, women can use menstrual cups instead of tampons and pads.

>>gambit+Ml
It's more like men bodies have more robust design, thus they get away with less items.

It's like women-day-off when they're on their period. On one hand, it'd be nice and makes sense. On the other hand, that sex-based discrimination.

Meanwhile over there we got flat VAT for everything. No tampon tax issues! :) Paying extra 21% for basic food sucks though.

>>gambit+Ml
Not necessarily. Diva cups are a thing. http://divacup.com/#