It should be seen as sexism, if company does not offer remote jobs.
Also women have more expenses than men (ping tax, daycare...). Big cities are unaffordable even at the same salary.
What's ping tax?
How is daycare more expensive for women? Surely, a man raising a child on their own will pay exactly the same amount of money for daycare? In a normal case, where partners raise children together, they surely pay for daycare from a shared budget, not just from the woman's salary(that would be just bizarre).
>> If woman gets high paying job, she makes less money for the same work.
The counter argument to this is that if this was true, companies would only hire women, since apparently they do the same work for less money!
The only case where I agree is that stupidly, UK government applies extra tax to sanitary items for women, while cosmetics for men do not have such tax. That is stupid, but that's a literal tax chosen by the government.
It's just normal VAT, the issue is that many "necessary" products don't have VAT on them, but tampons or pads do, even though they are a biological necessity.
It's like women-day-off when they're on their period. On one hand, it'd be nice and makes sense. On the other hand, that sex-based discrimination.
Meanwhile over there we got flat VAT for everything. No tampon tax issues! :) Paying extra 21% for basic food sucks though.