zlacker

[parent] [thread] 13 comments
1. interp+(OP)[view] [source] 2017-07-27 13:33:07
As I said, desktop Safari allows websites to prompt me for push notifications.

I can't stand it: that a web site has the ability to display a modal prompt sheet that I have to cancel.

replies(4): >>marpst+s >>fredle+31 >>jasonl+W3 >>matthe+b5
2. marpst+s[view] [source] 2017-07-27 13:36:09
>>interp+(OP)
This isn't new. Desktop browsers have been showing modal prompts via the javascript `prompt()` method for quite some time.
replies(2): >>santac+B >>falcol+P
◧◩
3. santac+B[view] [source] [discussion] 2017-07-27 13:37:42
>>marpst+s
> This isn't new.

Just because it is old doesn't make it a good user experience.

◧◩
4. falcol+P[view] [source] [discussion] 2017-07-27 13:39:09
>>marpst+s
It's not coincidental that the ability to do so has been actively limited by so many browsers (with opt-out forever options in some cases).
5. fredle+31[view] [source] 2017-07-27 13:41:02
>>interp+(OP)
It's not modal (like `alert`), it doesn't steal focus, at least not on any browser I've used.
6. jasonl+W3[view] [source] 2017-07-27 13:59:50
>>interp+(OP)
Disable it.

It's a feature some people like and use. I like getting notifications from some services I use without needing to keep a browser window open on that page to get notified. And I like not having to download and install yet another flipping app to get that feature.

replies(1): >>Spivak+d9
7. matthe+b5[view] [source] 2017-07-27 14:07:37
>>interp+(OP)
There's a preference to disable this, though. Don't get me wrong - it's awful and I hate it. But I'm sure there are valid use-cases for people who use e.g. webmail.
◧◩
8. Spivak+d9[view] [source] [discussion] 2017-07-27 14:30:56
>>jasonl+W3
I cant imagine a service that you frequent enough to want push notifications but not enough that you would be willing to install a native app for a smoother experience.
replies(3): >>jdauri+Re >>fenoma+Qx >>jasonl+IY
◧◩◪
9. jdauri+Re[view] [source] [discussion] 2017-07-27 15:07:25
>>Spivak+d9
One where the developer does not have enough resources to develop for and support multiple platforms?
replies(2): >>Spivak+vm >>jasonl+XY
◧◩◪◨
10. Spivak+vm[view] [source] [discussion] 2017-07-27 15:54:19
>>jdauri+Re
Right, but the parent's argument is that web notifications are a way to avoid installing a native app.
replies(1): >>jasonl+PY
◧◩◪
11. fenoma+Qx[view] [source] [discussion] 2017-07-27 16:58:20
>>Spivak+d9
> I cant imagine a service that you frequent enough to want push notifications but not enough that you would be willing to install a native app for a smoother experience.

Um. Email?

◧◩◪
12. jasonl+IY[view] [source] [discussion] 2017-07-27 19:53:42
>>Spivak+d9
Installing an app is not a smoother experience. Allowing notifications is one click. Also, apps don't always have the same features as websites. You also make the assumption that services I use with browser notifications also have apps. This is not true in the slightest. And in some cases, I still prefer the website over an app.

How is it hard to imagine a service I don't frequent use but when I do, I want notifications? I use these services a few times a year at most. Why would I want to install an app if they have it?

◧◩◪◨⬒
13. jasonl+PY[view] [source] [discussion] 2017-07-27 19:54:39
>>Spivak+vm
My argument is not limited to some thin line you define. Please don't speak for me or put words in my mouth that are not true.
◧◩◪◨
14. jasonl+XY[view] [source] [discussion] 2017-07-27 19:55:08
>>jdauri+Re
You get it.
[go to top]