zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. Spivak+(OP)[view] [source] 2017-07-27 14:30:56
I cant imagine a service that you frequent enough to want push notifications but not enough that you would be willing to install a native app for a smoother experience.
replies(3): >>jdauri+E5 >>fenoma+Do >>jasonl+vP
2. jdauri+E5[view] [source] 2017-07-27 15:07:25
>>Spivak+(OP)
One where the developer does not have enough resources to develop for and support multiple platforms?
replies(2): >>Spivak+id >>jasonl+KP
◧◩
3. Spivak+id[view] [source] [discussion] 2017-07-27 15:54:19
>>jdauri+E5
Right, but the parent's argument is that web notifications are a way to avoid installing a native app.
replies(1): >>jasonl+CP
4. fenoma+Do[view] [source] 2017-07-27 16:58:20
>>Spivak+(OP)
> I cant imagine a service that you frequent enough to want push notifications but not enough that you would be willing to install a native app for a smoother experience.

Um. Email?

5. jasonl+vP[view] [source] 2017-07-27 19:53:42
>>Spivak+(OP)
Installing an app is not a smoother experience. Allowing notifications is one click. Also, apps don't always have the same features as websites. You also make the assumption that services I use with browser notifications also have apps. This is not true in the slightest. And in some cases, I still prefer the website over an app.

How is it hard to imagine a service I don't frequent use but when I do, I want notifications? I use these services a few times a year at most. Why would I want to install an app if they have it?

◧◩◪
6. jasonl+CP[view] [source] [discussion] 2017-07-27 19:54:39
>>Spivak+id
My argument is not limited to some thin line you define. Please don't speak for me or put words in my mouth that are not true.
◧◩
7. jasonl+KP[view] [source] [discussion] 2017-07-27 19:55:08
>>jdauri+E5
You get it.
[go to top]