> I am thankful that Apple does not allow to litter it with some JS scraps.
Oh, so much for being objective. References and all.
> All this cross-platform talk is just being cheap, being lazy or both.
Are you even serious? You really blame engineers/developers coming up with trade-offs for being cheap and/or lazy?
> And I would not be surprised that maintaining cross-platform monstrosity eats away any cost-savings pretty quickly.
No it doesn't. I'm a developer since much more than 10 years. I guess that's enough of a reference :)
And come on, JS is a C-style language. If you know one you know them all.
It's also not a difficult jump to OOP languages; especially now that Java 8 supported lambdas and C# supports async/await. It's hard to learn concepts, not syntax.
At least that's the case if it's logically similar. C, Java, JS, etc are mostly transferable. I might not say the same about something like Haskell.