zlacker

[parent] [thread] 0 comments
1. tyingq+(OP)[view] [source] 2017-01-05 16:14:05
Ahh, yeah. So they only specifically care about interfering from an extension if the extension's ads are interfering.

I guess they just invented this "single purpose" policy to be able to ban things without coming right out and saying "you're hurting our revenue stream" :)

There must be someone from legal that's advising them not to ever say anything specific about extensions that mess with ads.

[go to top]