zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. dang+(OP)[view] [source] 2016-12-06 23:23:53
HN is for what's intellectually interesting—not the other kinds of interesting.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

replies(1): >>lmm+Q5
2. lmm+Q5[view] [source] 2016-12-07 00:32:38
>>dang+(OP)
I see no contradiction between being pornographic and being intellectually interesting.
replies(1): >>dang+mc
◧◩
3. dang+mc[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-12-07 02:00:25
>>lmm+Q5
The intersection of the two might be ok, but not the set-difference.
replies(1): >>lmm+Xw
◧◩◪
4. lmm+Xw[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-12-07 08:11:06
>>dang+mc
Well sure. It's always been a question of things in the intersection, with politics as well.

(While you're here I'll remind you about turning off flagging on some overly-politicised stories that were being flagkilled earlier this year - if you're worried about HN becoming overly political then that sent the opposite message)

replies(1): >>dang+xz
◧◩◪◨
5. dang+xz[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-12-07 09:05:14
>>lmm+Xw
I'm sure we do send opposite messages sometimes, because there are contradictory concerns.
[go to top]