zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. lmm+(OP)[view] [source] 2016-12-06 10:22:03
HN has no ban on porn that I'm aware of; erotica has been upvoted and no doubt will be again.
replies(1): >>dang+Yr1
◧
2. dang+Yr1[view] [source] 2016-12-06 23:23:53
>>lmm+(OP)
HN is for what's intellectually interesting—not the other kinds of interesting.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

replies(1): >>lmm+Ox1
◧◩
3. lmm+Ox1[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-12-07 00:32:38
>>dang+Yr1
I see no contradiction between being pornographic and being intellectually interesting.
replies(1): >>dang+kE1
◧◩◪
4. dang+kE1[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-12-07 02:00:25
>>lmm+Ox1
The intersection of the two might be ok, but not the set-difference.
replies(1): >>lmm+VY1
◧◩◪◨
5. lmm+VY1[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-12-07 08:11:06
>>dang+kE1
Well sure. It's always been a question of things in the intersection, with politics as well.

(While you're here I'll remind you about turning off flagging on some overly-politicised stories that were being flagkilled earlier this year - if you're worried about HN becoming overly political then that sent the opposite message)

replies(1): >>dang+v12
◧◩◪◨⬒
6. dang+v12[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-12-07 09:05:14
>>lmm+VY1
I'm sure we do send opposite messages sometimes, because there are contradictory concerns.
[go to top]