zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. dang+(OP)[view] [source] 2016-12-05 22:07:47
> (dang says to overflag rather than underflag in this regard anyhow)

But only for this week. After that, maybe the other way around.

replies(1): >>jc_811+A3
2. jc_811+A3[view] [source] 2016-12-05 22:29:26
>>dang+(OP)
To my point though, couldn't any topic in the world be linked back to politics one way or another? I could understand if the guidelines were don't talk about political parties, politicians, policy, etc. However having a blanket "no political topics" opens the door to flag anything

If I post about the rising cost of computers, is that political since costs could be influenced by tariffs or gov policy?

I've always felt the HN community as a whole was respectful to political points and now seeing this be censored is a bit of a downer.

replies(1): >>dang+Q02
◧◩
3. dang+Q02[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-12-06 20:17:39
>>jc_811+A3
Yes, a great many commenters made the same point, and I agree with it. Still, some topics are clearly more political than others, and our concern is the ones that lead to flamewars that threaten the values of this site.

"Censored" is one of those words that mean so many different things it becomes hard to communicate with them. Use it if you like, but don't forget we're talking about just a one-week breather from politics. Or let's say "most politics" if the imprecision there is bothersome.

replies(1): >>jc_811+Mv4
◧◩◪
4. jc_811+Mv4[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-12-08 00:34:28
>>dang+Q02
Really appreciate you taking the time to answer all of these comments & concerns. Guess it's time now to sit back and see where this takes us
[go to top]