zlacker

[return to "Tell HN: Political Detox Week – No politics on HN for one week"]
1. jc_811+gp[view] [source] 2016-12-05 21:44:23
>>dang+(OP)
A submission on climate change was flagged and removed due to these political guidelines. Is this really considered political? Wouldn't it be more justified to call it 'scientific'?

How is anyone supposed to realistically draw the line between what is political and what is not? Couldn't any topic in the world be related back to politics one way or another?

This seems like a blatant plot to censor 'unwanted' topics and articles. A huge downvote from me.

◧◩
2. ocdtre+Hr[view] [source] 2016-12-05 22:01:16
>>jc_811+gp
If it's the one I recall, it was about "how to talk to climate change deniers" or something like that. I flagged it (dang says to overflag rather than underflag in this regard anyhow). I'd have a hard time categorizing it as "not political". It's a charged political topic, the details of that conversation had nothing to do with technology, and almost entirely were about "how to argue with the people you disagree with" who happen to almost entirely belong to a single political party.
◧◩◪
3. dang+ts[view] [source] 2016-12-05 22:07:47
>>ocdtre+Hr
> (dang says to overflag rather than underflag in this regard anyhow)

But only for this week. After that, maybe the other way around.

◧◩◪◨
4. jc_811+3w[view] [source] 2016-12-05 22:29:26
>>dang+ts
To my point though, couldn't any topic in the world be linked back to politics one way or another? I could understand if the guidelines were don't talk about political parties, politicians, policy, etc. However having a blanket "no political topics" opens the door to flag anything

If I post about the rising cost of computers, is that political since costs could be influenced by tariffs or gov policy?

I've always felt the HN community as a whole was respectful to political points and now seeing this be censored is a bit of a downer.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. dang+jt2[view] [source] 2016-12-06 20:17:39
>>jc_811+3w
Yes, a great many commenters made the same point, and I agree with it. Still, some topics are clearly more political than others, and our concern is the ones that lead to flamewars that threaten the values of this site.

"Censored" is one of those words that mean so many different things it becomes hard to communicate with them. Use it if you like, but don't forget we're talking about just a one-week breather from politics. Or let's say "most politics" if the imprecision there is bothersome.

[go to top]