zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. Reedx+(OP)[view] [source] 2016-09-28 01:44:25
Yeah, I should have been clearer - the assumption is that it would have self sustaining revenue at some point (I can't imagine many investors would keep putting $ into it after 50 years). It would just be a break even business.

That's why I would say it's a success to everyone but the investors who never got their payday.

replies(1): >>jonkne+f3
2. jonkne+f3[view] [source] 2016-09-28 02:35:24
>>Reedx+(OP)
> That's why I would say it's a success to everyone but the investors who never got their payday.

Yes, so it would not be a successful venture backed company. Lifestyle businesses are fine if you pay for them. When someone else invests and expects a return you need to provide a return to be successful.

[go to top]