zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. mbesto+(OP)[view] [source] 2016-09-27 22:28:23
It might be "successful" (however you define that), but $8.3M in Revenue in 2014 (and an estimated $10M in 2015) on $50M in investment (not including Conde Naste's investment) in a 10 year period for a company valued at $500M and the 25th most visited site, seems like it's under-performing.
replies(1): >>rhizom+g6
◧
2. rhizom+g6[view] [source] 2016-09-27 23:22:29
>>mbesto+(OP)
Underperforming relative to what standard?
replies(2): >>nashas+Z8 >>mbesto+bd
◧◩
3. nashas+Z8[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-09-27 23:51:28
>>rhizom+g6
ROI: the standard of YC
◧◩
4. mbesto+bd[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-09-28 00:46:35
>>rhizom+g6
Underperforming versus it's competitors. I know of several websites that do 1/1000th of the traffic and have similar, if not better revenue.
replies(1): >>rhizom+N62
◧◩◪
5. rhizom+N62[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-09-28 22:29:11
>>mbesto+bd
I wonder if branding strategies keep their numbers down. I don't ever see a sidebar ad for Coca Cola.
[go to top]