zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. burkam+(OP)[view] [source] 2016-08-30 18:38:27
Ok, I guess I see where you're coming from, although that sort of usage seems almost too over the top to happen in real life. But as I said in another comment, we're not referring to a specific person in this context, we're talking about an abstract human being. Unless there's a risk of denigrating "users of technology" or something, I don't see an issue.
replies(2): >>throwa+61 >>legodt+s2
2. throwa+61[view] [source] 2016-08-30 18:46:46
>>burkam+(OP)
> I don't see an issue

Others seem to. It may be worth taking their perspective into account along with your own. But that's your consideration to make.

3. legodt+s2[view] [source] 2016-08-30 18:55:29
>>burkam+(OP)
Yes (again). It is sadly still very prevalent in trans/genderqueer/genderfucked communities, but I don't quite see the connection to this abstract human/spambot the grandparent was offended by/referring to.
replies(1): >>throwa+ca
◧◩
4. throwa+ca[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-08-30 19:54:13
>>legodt+s2
Hardly offended, if it's me you mean there. I just think it's not a good habit to get into.
[go to top]