zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. legodt+(OP)[view] [source] 2016-08-30 18:10:27
Yes. "It" as a pronoun is used to denigrate marginalized group such as ethnic minorities, individuals who do not adhere to traditional binary gender norms, or other groups that one may wish to, in a way, remove their humanity through pronoun usage. "It," in modern English, is cold, unliving, and reserved for objects rather than living people.
replies(1): >>burkam+84
2. burkam+84[view] [source] 2016-08-30 18:38:27
>>legodt+(OP)
Ok, I guess I see where you're coming from, although that sort of usage seems almost too over the top to happen in real life. But as I said in another comment, we're not referring to a specific person in this context, we're talking about an abstract human being. Unless there's a risk of denigrating "users of technology" or something, I don't see an issue.
replies(2): >>throwa+e5 >>legodt+A6
◧◩
3. throwa+e5[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-08-30 18:46:46
>>burkam+84
> I don't see an issue

Others seem to. It may be worth taking their perspective into account along with your own. But that's your consideration to make.

◧◩
4. legodt+A6[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-08-30 18:55:29
>>burkam+84
Yes (again). It is sadly still very prevalent in trans/genderqueer/genderfucked communities, but I don't quite see the connection to this abstract human/spambot the grandparent was offended by/referring to.
replies(1): >>throwa+ke
◧◩◪
5. throwa+ke[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-08-30 19:54:13
>>legodt+A6
Hardly offended, if it's me you mean there. I just think it's not a good habit to get into.
[go to top]