zlacker

[return to ""]
1. mrweas+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-01-13 16:50:11
I loved Dilbert, having worked for more than one Dilbert-like company the humor frequently resonated with me.

How or why Scott Adams went completely of the rails is perhaps something we'll sadly never understand. Was this opinions he'd always had, but suppressed, did he somehow become radicalized or was it perhaps medically induced, e.g. a stroke or something. It was incredibly sad to see him throw away his life's work and go down a path most of us at least hadn't foreseen and die having alienated his fans.

2. dragon+03[view] [source] 2026-01-13 16:59:44
>>mrweas+(OP)
> How or why Scott Adams went completely of the rails is perhaps something we'll sadly never understand. Was this opinions he'd always had, but suppressed,

They weren't surpressed; he was very open about them from very early on in his career as a comic artist; they were central to his “origin story” and were woven directly into the comics. Its just, for a while, other aspects of his still-recent experience in corporate America gave him other relatable things to say that were mixed in with them, which made it easier to overlook them.

◧◩
3. cptski+a4[view] [source] 2026-01-13 17:02:59
>>dragon+03
Has anyone take the time to prove that out? I was a fan of the comic for years and don't recall there being a lot of casual racism strewn in.
◧◩◪
4. Anothe+K8[view] [source] 2026-01-13 17:17:14
>>cptski+a4
I specifically do remember comics poking fun at diversity initiatives. A quick search of "Dilbert comic about diversity" brings up some examples.

At the time i read those i probably thought they were on point. I've changed my views over the years. You can't keep them or you end up like Adams. That's probably the key to understanding him. He grew up in an era where black students were not allowed to attend white schools. The world changed. He didn't.

◧◩◪◨
5. Aloha+1d[view] [source] 2026-01-13 17:30:26
>>Anothe+K8
At the time, a lot of them were little more than lipstick on a pig.

It took a long time to actually get to diversity that was beyond token "person of group" inclusivity.

◧◩◪◨⬒
6. amroch+XS1[view] [source] 2026-01-14 00:48:06
>>Aloha+1d
Funny enough, to get to actual representative diversity you need to explicitly hire underrepresented candidates and pass up on white dudes. Which Scott famously complained about.

Damned if you do damned if you don’t.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
7. parine+t32[view] [source] 2026-01-14 02:18:53
>>amroch+XS1
> you need to explicitly hire underrepresented candidates and pass up on white dudes

If the initiatives that promoted diversity explicitly said that, they probably wouldn't have passed. The whole argument was about whether that was true because proponents would never be honest about that part so the public debate never got past that.

[go to top]