zlacker

[return to "I’ve removed Disqus. It was making my blog worse"]
1. mrweas+7b[view] [source] 2025-09-30 10:43:45
>>ry8806+(OP)
Other than the volume, one of the issues I have with these types of ads is that you're rarely able to report them as scams. Reddit have a similar issue. You can report an ad, but you have to pick "Other", there's no: "This ad is clearly a scam". That's by design obviously, because by removing the scams, most of the ad networks are left with very little inventory. Certainly not enough to fund all the ad supported service currently in operation through out the web.

When I forget to sign in to YouTube, I see the same pattern, shitty ads that are clearly only allowed because otherwise YouTube wouldn't have sufficient ad inventory to meet their internal KPIs.

◧◩
2. lupusr+ec[view] [source] 2025-09-30 10:56:53
>>mrweas+7b
The ad industry likes to say that their industry is clean and the people who buy ads for scams are the problem, but the truth is the entire industry is complicit with the scamming, and stuff like this shows it. If the ad industry were merely hapless victims of the scammers, rather than willful participants in the scamming, they'd be eager to receive reports of scams.
◧◩◪
3. mort96+9k[view] [source] 2025-09-30 12:17:09
>>lupusr+ec
I feel like there are almost two completely incompatible stories being sold by ad tech people. One is that "you shouldn't use an ad blocker, reputable websites have ads from Google and other reputable companies and they wouldn't be scams or malware". The other is that any time there's a story about malware and scams on reputable websites, they say: "there are so many ads being submitted, Google is doing their best but you can't expect them to successfully weed out every single bad ad".

The reality is, of course, that Google and its ilk doesn't give a single rat's ass about people falling from scams or getting infected by malware. Scams and malware pays better than "ethical" ads (to the degree that such a thing exists). It's a travesty that there are apparently no laws against their behavior.

◧◩◪◨
4. bradly+ZQ[view] [source] 2025-09-30 15:12:57
>>mort96+9k
Genuinely curious: why do I always get scammy ads in iOS apps and Google products but I don’t see anywhere near the same amount on Instagram or TikTok?

Are Meta and TikTok better at filtering scammy ads out? Maybe their ML recommendation systems realize I’d never click on such an ad and the other platforms can’t figure that out.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. cm2012+Zj1[view] [source] 2025-09-30 17:24:07
>>bradly+ZQ
IG, TikTok, Meta have a lot of data they can use to do good ad targeting that is harder to apply to Google/iOS apps. Also has to do with the ad format, placement, etc.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. bradly+eQ1[view] [source] 2025-09-30 19:47:59
>>cm2012+Zj1
I get that but I’m surprised that Google doesn’t have that info too. Google’s ad biz is bigger than Meta’s.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. cm2012+Fx2[view] [source] 2025-10-01 00:42:10
>>bradly+eQ1
Some formats are better than others. The Meta products comparable to GDN (audience network, various banner ad placements in its platforms) also kind of suck. Google wishes they had a feed based website, thats where people respond to direct respond ads in a big way.
[go to top]