zlacker

[return to "OpenAI staff threaten to quit unless board resigns"]
1. breadw+17[view] [source] 2023-11-20 14:06:24
>>skille+(OP)
If they join Sam Altman and Greg Brockman at Microsoft they will not need to start from scratch because Microsoft has full rights [1] to ChatGPT IP. They can just fork ChatGPT.

Also keep in mind that Microsoft hasn't actually given OpenAI $13 Billion because much of that is in the form of Azure credits.

So this could end up being the cheapest acquisition for Microsoft: They get a $90 Billion company for peanuts.

[1] https://stratechery.com/2023/openais-misalignment-and-micros...

◧◩
2. JumpCr+sk[view] [source] 2023-11-20 14:55:04
>>breadw+17
> Microsoft hasn't actually given OpenAI $13 Billion because much of that is in the form of Azure credits

To be clear, these don't go away. They remain an asset of OpenAI's, and could help them continue their research for a few years.

◧◩◪
3. toomuc+1l[view] [source] 2023-11-20 14:57:36
>>JumpCr+sk
"Cluster is at capacity. Workload will be scheduled as capacity permits." If the credits are considered an asset, totally possible to devalue them while staying within the bounds of the contractual agreement. Failing that, wait until OpenAI exhausts their cash reserves for them to challenge in court.
◧◩◪◨
4. p_j_w+5V[view] [source] 2023-11-20 17:47:48
>>toomuc+1l
It’s amazing to me to see people on HN advocate a giant company bullying a smaller one with these kind of skeezy tactics.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. toomuc+GX[view] [source] 2023-11-20 17:55:38
>>p_j_w+5V
Explaining how the gazelle is going to get eaten confidently jumping into the oasis isn't advocating for the crocodiles. See sibling comments.

Experience leads to pattern recognition, and this is the tech community equivalent of a David Attenborough production (with my profuse apologies to Sir Attenborough). Something about failing to learn history and repeating it should go here too.

If you can take away anything from observing this event unfold, learn from it. Consider how the sophisticated vs the unsophisticated act, how participants respond, and what success looks like. Also, slow is smooth, smooth is fast. Do not rush when the consequences of a misstep are substantial. You learning from this is cheaper than the cost for everyone involved. It is a natural experiment you get to observe for free.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. robbom+071[view] [source] 2023-11-20 18:28:59
>>toomuc+GX
This might be my favorite comment I've read on HN. Spot on.

Being able to watch the miss steps and the maneuvers of the people involved in real time is remarkable and there are valuable lessons to be learned. People have been saying this episode will go straight into case studies but what really solidifies that prediction is the openness of all the discussions: the letters, the statements, and above all the tweets - or are we supposed to call them x's now?

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. jzb+Ng1[view] [source] 2023-11-20 19:02:58
>>robbom+071
Well, the public posting of some communications that may be obfuscation of what’s really being done and said.
[go to top]