zlacker

>>convex+(OP)
Are those the first cracks in the AI market bubble?

>>dschue+D3
You must not use AI if you think this. AI is not the bubble. Everything AI will replace is the bubble.

>>Tohhou+q5
AI art is already boring. its all a fad, eventually the cracks start to show and you can't unsee those cracks. very similar to bitcoin. tbh.

>>lazyst+86
The interesting to boring scale depends on novelty. Given the ai oversaturation it works exactly as expected.

AI Art is currently in very early stage. In the real art space (3d modeling, sculpting, animation, vfx, animation, rigging, retargeting), it could make huge breakthroughs and multiply true artists' productivity in significant ways

>>eureki+o8
I've noticed that those who worship productivity tend to appreciate "content creators" not artists :)

>>nottor+vc
During my brief venture into 3d graphics I often found that 1 hour of truly creating is spaced between ten hours of fixing up UV's, redoing topology, finding cause for the seam, trying to make a watertight mesh for photon tracing, fighting the subdivision algorithm to retain details, diverting a edge loop, where it causes the less distress.

I call the first hour true productivity. The last part is, from the perspective of the end product, simply a wasted time. That's very similar to the boilerplate code everybody agrees is a necessary evil in the programming.

If AI allows to reduce the #2 it truly will have positive impact