zlacker

[return to "Privacy is priceless, but Signal is expensive"]
1. vizzah+PV[view] [source] 2023-11-16 20:29:51
>>mikece+(OP)
$6 million per year on outgoing SMS? Do not send SMS to users, make users send SMS to you instead to confirm their numbers! I have this solution for years and it works >90% of the time. The rest 10% is calling a verification number which drops calls with busy signal (no fees for the caller) but sees who is calling and is able to verify their number.
◧◩
2. johndo+941[view] [source] 2023-11-16 21:05:53
>>vizzah+PV
It would be great if Signal wouldn't require a phone number for account setup at all
◧◩◪
3. illiac+U41[view] [source] 2023-11-16 21:09:36
>>johndo+941
this is in testing and coming to you early next year.
◧◩◪◨
4. travis+I61[view] [source] 2023-11-16 21:19:23
>>illiac+U41
Would invites be a solution? Anyone can sign up if they provide a number, otherwise you need an invite from someone with a number linked. It would clump the identity/legitimacy for all invitees into origin number, but still allow disparate accounts.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. novok+S71[view] [source] 2023-11-16 21:25:00
>>travis+I61
It’s not about legitimacy but having a bootstrapped contact list to talk to along with other user friction reasons
[go to top]