zlacker

>>dang+it
Cool tech, but plastering "authentic" all over this kind of generated photography is really disingenuous and just rubs me the wrong way. I get that it's informed by real details from other photos, but that's not what authentic means.

If I buy an "authentic Rolex" and receive a Chinese Rolex clone that's built similarly based on observations of a real Rolex, I'm going to feel scammed and very upset. And I'm much more protective of my memories than I would be of a watch.

>>bhaney+Rh
I would argue that authentic is a relative term, and actually helped me understand the product more easily. IMO, it is “authentic” because, compared to other image fills, it tries to fill in the data using real data from other photos.

>>cmdli+Ri
I'd call that "contextual" rather than authentic.

>>flavor+(OP)
[stub for offtopicness]

>>HaZeus+Pq
let me give you an example. when i draw a mustache on a face in ms paint in brown, that's contextual but not authentic.