zlacker

[return to "Tell HN: t.co is adding a five-second delay to some domains"]
1. mutant+l1[view] [source] 2023-08-15 04:21:56
>>xslowz+(OP)
I think that HN itself also shadow flags submissions from a list of domains it doesn't like.

Try submitting a URL from the following domains, and it will be automatically flagged (but you can't see it's flagged unless you log out):

  - archive.is
  - watcher.guru
  - stacker.news
  - zerohedge.com
  - freebeacon.com
  - thefederalist.com
  - breitbart.com
◧◩
2. dang+p1[view] [source] 2023-08-15 04:22:20
>>mutant+l1
Well, yes, many sites are banned on HN. Others are penalized (see e.g. https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...). None of this is secret, though we don't publish the lists themselves.

Edit: about 67k sites are banned on HN. Here's a random selection of 10 of them:

  vodlockertv.com
  biggboss.org
  infoocode.com
  newyorkpersonalinjuryattorneyblog.com
  moringajuice.wordpress.com
  surrogacymumbai.com
  maximizedlivingdrlabrecque.com
  radio.com
  gossipcare.com
  tecteem.com
◧◩◪
3. rhaksw+s5[view] [source] 2023-08-15 05:05:41
>>dang+p1
It is a secret if the system does not inform the poster it's been penalized.
◧◩◪◨
4. predic+O8[view] [source] 2023-08-15 05:41:37
>>rhaksw+s5
There's a lot of user hostile moderation practices that occur on this site, manual and automatic. They're not often, or really at all, discussed. Some of them don't work well, and haven't for as long as they've existed.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. dang+mi[view] [source] 2023-08-15 07:28:10
>>predic+O8
I don't want us to be user hostile. Can you link to some examples?
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. johngl+gU[view] [source] 2023-08-15 13:10:35
>>dang+mi
I would consider any moderation action that isn't visible to users to be user hostile.

If you're going to censor someone, you owe it to them to be honest about what you're doing to them.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. DamonH+jD1[view] [source] 2023-08-15 17:00:33
>>johngl+gU
You possibly haven't experienced how devious and determined and dishonest and unpleasant some bad actors are, including SPAMmers.

(Even when doing the RightThing(TM) would probably be easier...)

And, BTW, I occasionally get blocked by the mechanisms here, even though not doing anything bad, but understand that there is a trade-off.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
8. johngl+7Q1[view] [source] 2023-08-15 17:56:01
>>DamonH+jD1
I am fully aware of the issue.

That's one of the costs with having a public website.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣
9. simonw+OY1[view] [source] 2023-08-15 18:45:09
>>johngl+7Q1
The HN moderation policies are clearly effective, because the site is mostly full of useful information that attracts a wide audience of readers.

I really like this take on moderation:

"The essential truth of every social network is that the product is content moderation, and everyone hates the people who decide how content moderation works. Content moderation is what Twitter makes — it is the thing that defines the user experience."

From Nilay Patel in https://www.theverge.com/2022/10/28/23428132/elon-musk-twitt...

[go to top]